Drawing for NANOMIX

USPTO serial 79088721

NANOMIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4144655Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2012
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOMIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Tyrrell

KATHLEEN A TYRRELL LICATA & TYRRELL PC66 EAST MAIN STREETMARLTON, NJ 08053UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental medicinal preparations for use as dental restorative materials, namely, core build-up materials or luting cements, which have to be mixed in a ratio from 1:1 to 5:1, all the foregoing being medicated preparations useful for preventing or treating tooth decay or periodontal diseaseSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Dental apparatus and instruments for application of dental materialSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 18, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 19, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 28, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 22, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 17, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 17, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 19, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 19, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance