Drawing for 555

USPTO serial 79088734

555

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4095053Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 7, 2012
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 555?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Meat, fish excluding canned fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables excluding potato chips; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030[ Coffee, ] tea [, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, edible ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces, condiments, namely, sauces; spices; ice for refreshment ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031[ Unprocessed grains, not included in other classes; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural plants and flowers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032[ Beer; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, beverages containing fruits, carbonated beverages, beverages with tea flavor; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups, namely, maple syrup, glucose syrup and other preparations for making beverages, namely, syrup substitute scented water, essences for making non alcoholic beverages ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 19, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 1, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 21, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 7, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 7, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 7, 2018C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 4, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Mar 5, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 26, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance