USPTO serial 79088747
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Curt Würstl Vermögensverwaltungs-GmbH & Co. KG
"4KRAFT" spólka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia
Poznan, PL
Other trademarks owned by "4KRAFT" spólka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jan Tamulewicz
Jan Tamulewicz Myers Wolin, LLC100 S. Jefferson Road, Suite 202WHIPPANY, NJ 07981-1009UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Child safety seats for cars; child safety seats for cars and covers therefor; bicycles; children's bicycles; bicycle seats, child seats for bicycles; pushchairs, baby strollers, hoods for pushchairs, covers for pushchairs; three-wheeled pushchairs, non-motorised vehicles in the nature of strollers and carts for transporting babies or small children; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | [ Baby carry cots, swing carriers for babies and small children; diaper bags, travelling bags, baby slings for carrying infants ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Children's beds, travel cots, baby rockers in the nature of rocking chairs, cots, Moses baskets, cradles, chairs and seating furniture for children and babies, baby bouncers, bed frames, structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, highchairs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | [ Games and playthings, namely, arcade games, dart games and plush toys; dolls' pushchairs, pedal vehicles for small children in the nature of ride-on toys with pedals, scooters toys ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 27, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |