Drawing for ANDRES MACHADO

USPTO serial 79088922

ANDRES MACHADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4072484Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2011
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANDRES MACHADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Shoes for men and women including high heel and low heel shoes, boots, loafers, lace shoes, sandals, flip flops, thong sandals, and casualsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 8, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jan 16, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 11, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 23, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance