Drawing for ALPHA Q

USPTO serial 79088950

ALPHA Q

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4166171Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2012
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHA Q?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Siegartel

Adam D. Siegartel Proskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-8299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Autogenous soldering machines and automated electric and laser welding machines; machines incorporating lasers for welding, soldering and cutting; devices for orbital welding, namely, electrical welding machines; automated welding machines; plasma welding machines; resistance welding machines for use in resistance spot welding and stud welding; electrical soldering machines; electrical machines for orbital welding; electrical welding machines; suction machines for welding fumes; electric plasma cutters; accessories for soldering and welding machines and cutting machines, namely, tables specially adapted to hold powered machinery, namely, soldering, welding, and cutting machines and automated filler wire feed devices for soldering and welding machines; cutting torchesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Laser welding devices and laser soldering devices; electrical soldering and welding torches; electrical soldering and welding torches with inert gas used for protection when welding electrically; electrical inert gas shielded arc welding torches not powered by gas; accessories for electric soldering and welding apparatus and arc-soldering and arc-welding apparatus, namely, welding power sources and blanks, namely, circuit boards with integrated circuits; welding electrodes, namely, stick electrodes, stick welding electrodes for tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding, solid wire welding electrodes, cored wire electrodesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Soldering and weldingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 29, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 28, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 3, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 18, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 25, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance