Drawing for I JUICE

USPTO serial 79089011

I JUICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I JUICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Battery chargers; electric batteries; electric storage batteries; electric accumulators; batteries; mounting devices for cellular telephones or personal digital assistants (PDA); cradles for cellular telephones or personal digital assistants (PDA); cellular telephones or personal digital assistants (PDA) battery chargers for use in vehicles; cellular telephones or personal digital assistants (PDA) battery chargersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 25, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 24, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance