USPTO serial 79089293
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather items and small leather items namely bags, handbags, clutch pouches, holdalls, hobo-style handbags, shoulder bags, rucksacks, school satchels, beach bags, traveling bags, shopping bags, sports bags, garment bags, traveling sets, briefcases, wallets, card cases (notecases), billfolds, purses (not of precious metal), attaché cases, school bags, purses, driving license cases made of leather, pocket cases made of leather, leather pouches, visiting card cases and holders made of leather, key cases, necktie cases, check-book holders made of leather, cases for pens; beauty cases, vanity cases (not fitted); trunks and suitcases, cases; collars for animals, leashes, covers for animals, harness for animals, bags for carrying animals; umbrellas | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |