Drawing for HEINE

USPTO serial 79089416

HEINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Stiven

Janet A. Stiven Dykema Gossett PLLC10 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2300Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring all kinds of clothing, footwear, headgear, goods made of leather and imitation of leather, bags, textiles goods, decoration articles, porcelain articles, furniture, lighting articles, electronic articles, jewelry, horological instruments and cosmetics accessible via mail order; on-line retail store services featuring all kinds of clothing, footwear, headgear, goods made of leather and imitation of leather, bags, textiles goods, decoration articles, porcelain articles, furniture, lighting articles, electronic articles, jewelry, horological instruments and cosmetics; retail stores featuring all kinds of clothing, footwear, headgear, goods made of leather and imitation of leather, bags, textiles goods, decoration articles, porcelain articles, furniture, lighting articles, electronic articles, jewelry, horological instruments and cosmeticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 12, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 5, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 25, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance