USPTO serial 79089522
MIDECO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4037040Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2011
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MIDECO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gina Durham, Esq.
Gina Durham, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | [ Industrial airborne particulate reduction apparatus, namely, fabric dust collectors and bag houses, and parts therefor, namely, filters, filter bags, bag housings and cloth bag filters; industrial scrubbers for removing particulate matter from air, namely, impingement baffle plate scrubbers and venturi scrubbers; industrial air pollution control equipment, apparatus and installations, namely, gravel bed filters; ] industrial dust suppression apparatus and installations, namely, pivot mounted baffle intake flaps for silos, hoppers and other bulk storage containers; air filtering installations for industrial use [ ; air filters and airborne dust collectors for use in industrial applications in the cement, concrete, grain, feed, wheat, chemical, fertilizer, mining, mineral and ore processing, timber processing, plaster powder and flour industries and in silo venting applications; gas scrubbers; gas scrubbers featuring venturi, impingement, baffle plate, wet scrubbing apparatus ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |