USPTO serial 79089569
TANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4133622Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2012
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical laboratory equipment for scientific and industrial purposes, included in this class, namely, temperature regulating apparatus, laboratory thermostats, namely, cold and heat thermostats, bath thermostats, pendant thermostats as well as circulatory thermostats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Huber Kältemaschinenbau SE
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Huber Kältemaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Huber Kältemaschinenbau GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TANGO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 1, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |