Drawing for BIG MAX

USPTO serial 79089581

BIG MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4140684Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2012
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Isabella Hoedl

ATTN: ISABELLA HOEDL C/O RECHTSANWÄLTE GMBHGLACISSTRAßE 27Graz, 8010AUSTRIA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorized golf cartsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Golf bagsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 15, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 1, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 11, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance