USPTO serial 79089601
PROBIOTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4148296Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2012
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROBIOTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
BRIAN M. DAVIS VLP Law Group LLP5960 FAIRVIEW ROAD; Suite 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, namely, in the treatment of materials | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, mattresses, pillows and cushions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles comprising natural or synthetic fibres, or blends thereof, produced as textile forms by conventional processes, including knitting, weaving and non-woven felts and used in interior furnishings coverings and decoration in domestic and public buildings, linings and other interior covers in automobiles and other transportation uses, namely, fabrics and canvases for upholstery, curtains and drapes, mattress ticking, mattress covers, clothing, lining and interlinings; duvets; bed covers; table covers, namely, table cloths of textile | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and carpet underlays for covering existing floors; non-textile wall hangings | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, by the application of friable microcapsules containing suitable non-pathogenic bacterial spores that, upon release by breaking the microcapsules, colonize the surfaces of treated materials where the bacterial colonies consume unwanted matters such as dirt, soil, and excrement of house dust mites on the surface of the treated material, thereby improving hygiene and reducing the incidence of allergic reactions to these matters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEVAN CHEMICALS NV
- Other trademarks owned by DEVAN CHEMICALS NV
- Other trademarks owned by Devan Chemicals NV
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named PROBIOTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |