Drawing for PROYIELD

USPTO serial 79089664

PROYIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4072494Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 20, 2011
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PROYIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

Roberto Ledesma LAW OFFICE OF ROBERTO LEDESMAPO BOX 230692NEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food supplements for medical use; milk ferments for pharmaceutical purposes; dietetic substances and foodstuffs for medical, namely, dietetic foods adapted for medical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 25, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 23, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 10, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 16, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 20, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 10, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 8, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance