Drawing for BUSHIDO

USPTO serial 79089753

BUSHIDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSHIDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; iceSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 20, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 15, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 9, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance