Drawing for SAWTEC

USPTO serial 79089791

SAWTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAWTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools; machines for metalworking; knives (parts of machines); saw blades (parts of machines); saws (machines); cutting inserts for saw blades (parts of machines), especially cutting inserts made of hard metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 1, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance