USPTO serial 79089897
PIXI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's books and painting books for children | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |