Drawing for ECOLIFT

USPTO serial 79090034

ECOLIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3983724Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 28, 2011
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOLIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DRIVEWILLIS TOWER, SUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated machines and apparatus for the digging, excavating, mechanical handling, lifting, loading and transporting of earth, minerals, soil, crops and the like, namely, agricultural machines, namely, telescopic handlers and wheeled loaders; earthmoving machines, namely, loaders, backhoes and excavators; power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, forklifts and telehandlers; front end loaders; skid-steer loaders; compacting and vibrating machines and equipment, namely, earth-compacting machines, including vibratory plate compactors; road rollers used with asphalt paving; asphalt and concrete cutting machines; parts and fittings included in this class for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 1, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 2, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 18, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 18, 2018C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 18, 2018CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 17, 2018CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Apr 9, 2018CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 11, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance