USPTO serial 79090054
SMARTFORMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4140685Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTFORMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
83395 Freilassing, DE
83395 Freilassing, DE
83395 Freilassing, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools, except injection molding machines, namely, machines and machine tools for the forming of materials, namely, metalworking machine tools; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine couplings and transmission components except for land vehicles; machines for the vacuum forming and pneumatic forming of plastic sheets and plastic films; machines for the vacuum forming and pneumatic forming of plastic sheets and plastic films for packaging, in particular for manufacturing transparent packaging; machines for vacuum forming and pneumatic forming and pressing, and machines for the mechanical compressing of plastic sheets and plastic films, and the laminating of plastic sheets and plastic films, as well as plastic-coated and non-coated textile materials on preformed backing elements for manufacturing compound elements, in particular for the automobile industry, namely, dashboards and interior trim; moulds and machine tools, namely, tools for forming, pressing and laminating plastic for the aforesaid machines, except injection molding machines; automatic machines for feeding plastic films, textiles, plastic sheets and backing elements into the aforesaid machines; automatic machines for transferring and removing parts manufactured in the aforesaid machines; machines for sorting and stacking goods manufactured in the aforesaid machines; machines for tearing off articles manufactured in the aforesaid machines along the structure within a film; machines for removing waste parts during the manufacture of articles in the aforesaid machines; stamps, namely, punching presses for pre-punching and punching out articles manufactured in the aforesaid machines from plastic films and plastic sheets; longitudinal cutting and cross-cutting machines and installations constructed therefrom, for cutting articles manufactured in the aforesaid machines from plastic films and plastic sheets; machines for manufacturing mono-extruded and co-extruded plastic films and plastic sheets; waste shredding mills for manufacturing plastic granules; installations mainly constructed from the aforesaid machines, automatic machines and apparatus, for manufacturing thermoformed parts; radio frequency generators; high-frequency welding machines; ultrasound and vibration welding machines; hot air welding machines; thermocontact welding machines; heat impulse welding machines; industrial high-frequency heating and drying machines, in particular for paper gluing and fabric setting in the clothing industry; single-column and portal-type welding presses; automatic machines for feeding the aforesaid machines with films and auxiliary materials, namely, stiffening materials; automatic assembly and transfer machines; automatic machines for manufacturing packaging from thermoformed plastic films and plastic sheets, and from plastic films and plastic sheets welded using high-frequency energy; mechanical apparatus for tearing off articles manufactured in the aforesaid machines along the structure within a film; mechanical apparatus for removing waste parts during the manufacture of articles in the aforesaid machines; machine tools, namely, welding tools for the aforesaid machines; automatic stamping and punching presses; mechanical large stamping machines; heat contact gluing machines, in particular for gluing glass and metal parts; assembly lines, namely, a series of machines for the positioning and gluing of plastic, metal and ceramic parts onto interior and exterior trim during automobile assembly; longitudinal cutting and cross-cutting machines for films; installations, namely, a series of assembly line machines for forming, cutting and stacking parts of packages in successive stages; rotational molding installations for manufacturing film skins, mainly for the automobile sector | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 15, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |