USPTO serial 79090167
REPEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REPEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Alloys of precious metal, jewellery and imitation jewellery, articles of jewellery made of precious metals and metal alloys and non-precious metals, and semi-precious materials, costume jewellery; trinkets, namely, necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings, and bag jewelry for personal use; jewellery for personal use; fashion jewellery, precious stones, mechanical and automatic watches and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, treggings, cardigans, shirts, scarves, tank tops, ponchos, tunics, sweaters, short-sleeved and long-sleeved jerseys, blazers, boleros and knitted ballerina shoes; leggings, jeggings, jeans, shorts, gloves, and pullovers; baby clothing, namely, pants, baby jackets, pullovers, romper suits, sleepers, baby shoes; men's clothing, namely, pullovers, cardigans, and scarfs; articles of footwear, other than orthopaedic or protective; headgear, namely, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothing, headwear, footgear, clothing accessories, jewellery, watches and clocks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Repeat S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Joseph Tugendhaft
- Other trademarks owned by REPEAT GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named REPEAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |