Drawing for OPENCONTROL

USPTO serial 79090228

OPENCONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENCONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, namely, for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal; numerically controlled machines and machine tools used for the cutting and forming of materials, namely, for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electronic systems and electronic apparatus, namely, drives in the nature of servo-drives for speed, torque, acceleration, and positioning of either brush or brushless servo-motors, axes electrical controllers, servo boards in the nature of servomotors and electronic boards for driving servo-drives through analog or digital bus and electronic boards and input / output electronic systems for acquiring and sending data from and to the field through digital bus, electrical controllers of machine devices, electronic interface equipment for machine tools to input or output computer numerical control (CNC) data, programmable logic controller (PLC), human machine interface (HMI) used as interfaces for control and automation applications, all for machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal; Computer programs for industrial automation and for operational control of machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal; numerical control electronic systems for machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal, namely, numerical electronic control systems and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal, and general motion control (GMC) electronic systems for the management of automation systems, automation, production lines, packaging and process control, and computerized numerical control (CNC) electronic systems for developing programs for the management of machine tools and / or laser machines, electro discharge machines, water jet machines, and deformation machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computers and computer programs for numerical control devices for use with machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal; technological services, namely, technological consultation in the technology field of machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal and technological research and design for others relating thereto; industrial analysis in the field of machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal, namely, testing, quality control, process control, analysis and evaluation of materials, namely, wood, plastic, glass, marble, metal; research services in the field of machines and machine tools for working wood, plastic, glass, marble, metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 16, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 5, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 22, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance