Drawing for MASTERLUX

USPTO serial 79090374

MASTERLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065264Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Buck Richard

Molly Buck Richard Richard Law Group8411 Preston RoadSuite 890Dallas, TX 75225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuits; semiconductor devices; integrated circuit cards; printed electronic circuits for apparatus and cards containing integrated circuits; integrated circuit microprocessors; cards for integrated circuits or microprocessors; * all except all goods for the financial sector *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 11, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Feb 11, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 26, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance