Drawing for MASTERLUX

USPTO serial 79090374

MASTERLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065264Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly Buck Richard

Molly Buck Richard Richard Law Group8411 Preston RoadSuite 890Dallas, TX 75225

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuits; semiconductor devices; integrated circuit cards; printed electronic circuits for apparatus and cards containing integrated circuits; integrated circuit microprocessors; cards for integrated circuits or microprocessors; * all except all goods for the financial sector *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 19, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 13, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 13, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Nov 11, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 11, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Mar 11, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Mar 8, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
Mar 8, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Feb 11, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 11, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 26, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 7, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance