Drawing for KREMLIN GOLD

USPTO serial 79090390

KREMLIN GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KREMLIN GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic extracts; alcoholic essences; alcoholic beverages (except beer); anisette (liqueur); anise (liqueur); aperitifs: arak (arrack); arrack (arak); brandy; wine; kirsch; vodka; bitters; distilled beverages; gin; digesters (liqueurs and spirits); cocktails; perry; curacao; liqueurs: hydromel (mead); mead (hydromel); peppermint liqueurs; rice alcohol; piquette; fruit (beverages); whiskySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 21, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance