Drawing for OPTALUX

USPTO serial 79090621

OPTALUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTALUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatus and installations, namely luminous house numbers, light diffusers, glass lamp globes, laboratory table lamps, chandeliers, lamp reflectors, lamp chimneys, electric Chinese lanterns, street lamps, safety lamps for underground use, electric lamps, lamps, lanterns, luminous lanterns, lamp shades, ceiling lights, projector lamps, light reflectors, stage lighting lampsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 12, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 23, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance