Drawing for RELUX

USPTO serial 79090694

RELUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4027678Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 20, 2011
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RELUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Lueders

Daniel J. Lueders Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers and software, namely, computer operating hardware and software for designing lighting installations as well as for organisation, storage and access to data in databases regarding luminaires, light sources and electronic components [ data media, namely, CDs, DVDs and optical discs all sold blank ]ACTIVE—
042Computer system design; computer software consultancy; industrial analysis and research services in the field of engineering; design and development of computer and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 7, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 6, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 26, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 12, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 26, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 23, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 1, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 20, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2011ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2011LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 3, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance