USPTO serial 79090732
LINFLAIR SOFTER THAN LINEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4072513Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2011
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LINFLAIR SOFTER THAN LINEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Ter., Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods, namely, table linen, tablecloths, napkins; napkin pouches, namely, paper napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery or snacks, biodegradable wood pulp paper napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery and snacks and airlaid, namely, nonwoven wood pulp paper napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery and snack | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | [ textiles, namely, cotton fabric, non-woven material, namely, table linen, table cloths, napkins, napkin pouches, namely, napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery and snacks, and textile goods, namely, table linen, table cloths, napkins and napkin pouches, namely, napkins adapted for use as a cover for cutlery and snacks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |