Drawing for MICRODYNE

USPTO serial 79090831

MICRODYNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4166177Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2012
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRODYNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam D. Siegartel

Adam D. Siegartel Proskauer Rose LLPEleven Times SquareTrademark File RoomNew York, NY 10036-8299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for processing powdery materialSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Microdosing apparatuses, namely, mechanical devices used as dispensers of preset portions of solid granules and powders for compacting quantities of powders and granulate materials in the chemical, pharmaceutical, and foodstuff industries for dosing purposes, all not for medical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 1, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 29, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 3, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 9, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance