USPTO serial 79090842
ROTOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081799Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROTOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Beaker
Craig A. Beaker Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, adhesive product labels, printed product labels, paper used in lamination, liners for cigarette boxes, gift wrap paper and paper or cardboard printed with holograms; ] metalized, laminated and coated paper [ and cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, adhesive product labels, printed product labels, liners for cigarette boxes, gift wrap paper and paper or cardboard printed with holograms; plastic film for packaging and wrapping for household, residential and stationery purposes; metalized plastic film for household, residential and stationery purposes; woven, non-woven and fiber-based paper and cellophane paper substrates; woven, non-woven and fiber-based print substrates, namely, transparent, opaque and translucent films for use with inkjet printers, inkjet copiers and laser printers; packaging materials made of metalized, laminated and/or coated paper or cardboard ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | [ Plastic film for commercial and industrial use; metalized plastics in the form of sheets, films, blocks, rods and tubes; semi-finished plastics material in the form of films for commercial and industrial use and not for the manufacturing of shoe stiffening materials; woven, non-woven and fiber-based substrates primarily made of synthetic polymers, plastics or regenerated cellophane ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Services of coating of metal, paper, cardboard, foil, plastic, tissues, textiles, and woven, non-woven and fiber-based substrates; metalizing and laminating of metal, paper, cardboard, foil, plastic, tissues, textiles, and woven, non-woven and fiber-based substrates ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NISSHA METALLIZING SOLUTIONS N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by AR Metallizing
- Other trademarks owned by AR Metallizing
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ROTOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |