USPTO serial 79090951
VIWATEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4081811Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIWATEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
Todd A. Denys PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C.29 Thanet Road, Suite 201Princeton, NJ 08540-3674UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | TREATMENT OF MATERIALS, NAMELY, SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALS, PLASTICS AND RUBBER | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |