USPTO serial 79091017
TRIAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Swedo
KEITH SWEDO TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLPONE INDIANA SQUARESUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soap; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, and goods made of leather and imitation leather, namely, purses; animal skins; handbags; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks; whips and saddlery | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shoes, ties, scarves, pants, dresses, skirts, jackets, pants, blouses, coats, jerseys, footwear, headgear, namely, hats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |