USPTO serial 79091045
THE EXCEPTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE EXCEPTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Australian wine, and excluding any wine made in France | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |