USPTO serial 79091054
MARIO VALENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4024693Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARIO VALENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry and costume jewelry; cuff links, tie pins; watches and cases therefor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |