Drawing for LUST

USPTO serial 79091114

LUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flours and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery, edible ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); spices; ice for refreshment, chocolates, pralines, confectionerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 23, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 23, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 31, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 10, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 12, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance