USPTO serial 79091155
TANDEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANDEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Gentner
Marsha G. Gentner Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical, medical and dental apparatus and insturments for use in dermatology and plastic surgery indications, and treatment of skin imperfections; lasers for dermatology, medical esthetics and dental purposes and their parts and accessories included in this class; laser systems for cosmetic, dermatological and esthetic procedures; lasers for skin rejuvenation for medical purposes, and for the cosmetic treatment of the face and skin | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical services; veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals; beauty salons; massage; plastic surgery; dermatology services; laser skin rejuvenation; providing information on laser skin rejuvenation; medical consultancy relating to laser skin rejuvenation | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |