Drawing for ULTRA LUX

USPTO serial 79091184

ULTRA LUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4069196Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2011
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA LUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Myers

JONATHAN MYERS KF ROSS, P.C.5720 MOSHOLU AVE.P.O. BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical, photographic and cinematographic apparatus and equipment, included in this class, in particular photographic and cinematographic lenses, projection and magnifying lenses, light filters for cameras and projectors, lens hoods, distance and light meters, magnifying glasses, vario-lenses for use with cameras and projectors, attachments, namely, special effect lens attachments, lenses for electrotechnical and electronic projection apparatus, and for cinematographic and photographic apparatus, optical projection and recording apparatus for still and moving pictures, and optical lens systems for the aforesaid apparatus comprised of optical lenses and optical sensors, telescopes, object finders, namely, photographic finders, namely, straight viewfinders, angle viewfinders, electronic viewfinders; in-flight optical apparatus and equipment, included in this class, namely, optical lenses in the field of aviation and aerospaceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 30, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 20, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 20, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 13, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 4, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 18, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 17, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 29, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 13, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance