USPTO serial 79091293
ECOTHERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOTHERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for heating, refrigerating, water supply and sanitary purposes; heat pumps, heat regenerators, namely, heat generators and furnaces; heat accumulators; heat exchangers; water heating apparatus, namely, hot water heaters; water heaters; water heating installations, namely, gas water heaters, tankless water heaters, and water heaters for domestic, commercial or industrial use; water softening apparatus and installations; water filtering apparatus; complete installations for warm water and steam, namely, steam generating installations combined with a water heater, and steam heating apparatuses for industrial purposes combined with an industrial water heater; pure steam generators; heating boilers; steam boilers; block heating stations, namely, pavement heating apparatus, heating system composed primarily of tubes, pipes and manifolds through which warm or high temperature water circulates; electric kettles; cooling installations for water, namely, water cooling towers, water coolers; mixer taps for water pipes; water conduits installations, namely, heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes and pre-assembled manifolds through which cold or low temperature water circulates, regulating accessories for water supply in the nature of metered valves; water purification installations, devices and machines, namely, water purification tanks, water purification units; water supply installations, namely, regulating accessories for water supply in the nature of metered valves, pressure regulators for water installations, mixer faucets for water pipes, tap water faucets; water distribution installations, namely, regulating accessories for water supply in the nature of metered valves, pressure regulators for water installations, mixer faucets for water pipes, tap water faucets; water storage installations, namely, water cooling towers, water purification tanks; water recycling installations, namely, water purification and filtration apparatus for use in recycling wastewater; ventilation installations, namely, ventilating exhaust fans, ventilating fans for commercial and industrial use, ventilating louvers; solar collectors; solar collectors for power generation; solar installations, namely, solar heat collection panels, solar collectors for heating, solar energy based cooling apparatus; all of the aforementioned goods except kerosene stoves and dehumidifiers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 15, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |