USPTO serial 79091355
VIBENITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4188432Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2012
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIBENITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Byrne, Registration No. 28,498
Richard L. Byrne, Registration No. 28,498 The Webb Law Firm420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200Pittsburgh, PA 15222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metals and metal alloys; metals in powder form; base metals with carbide content; unworked and partly worked common metals for further manufacture; base metals and their alloys | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for metalworking, namely, free form fabrication machines for manufacturing three-dimensional objects layer-by-layer directly from computer-assisted drafting images, without using conventional tools for moulds using electrically conductive plastic or metal powders, and operating software therefor, sold as a unit | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus and instruments for measuring and supervision; control and monitoring computer hardware equipment for manufacturing machines for three-dimensional objects manufactured layer-by-layer directly from computer-assisted drafting images, without using conventional tools for moulds using electrically conductive plastic or metal powders; computer programs for design and working of metal objects and controlling machines for the working of metal objects; computer programs for production planning for producing metal objects; computer programs for controlling metal manufacturing machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, manufacturing three-dimensional industrial machine parts for others layer-by-layer directly from computer-assisted drafting images, without using conventional tools for moulds using electrically conductive plastic or metal powders; working of industrially-produced material, namely, metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VBN Components AB
- Other trademarks owned by VBN Components Intellectual Property AB
- Other trademarks owned by VBN Components Intellectual Property AB
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VIBENITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |