USPTO serial 79091461
THE SNUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4169692Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2012
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SNUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
LU
LU
LU
LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea E. Bates
Andrea E. Bates Bates & Bates, LLC1890 Marietta Blvd., NWAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Loudspeakers, audio speakers, headphones, and in ear headphones | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Neill Brand S.à.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Neil Brand S.à r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Neil Brand S.à r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Neill Brand S.à r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE SNUG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |