USPTO serial 79091542
IQON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IQON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric M. Schmalz and Richard J. McKenna
ERIC M SCHMALZ FOLEY LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVENUEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for regulating and controlling the functions of electric components of vehicles; on board vehicle electronic systems, namely, interactive vehicle control system in the nature of on-board computers for integrating, managing and providing driver access to functions of vehicle navigation system, entertainment system, telephones, vehicle environmental information and control systems for heating and cooling systems in vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles and structural parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |