USPTO serial 79091551
CLC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4169694Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2012
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
Zhongshan, CN
Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Perfume atomizers, sold empty; spray cans, not adapted for medical use, namely, non-metal aerosol cans sold empty; utensils for toilet purposes, namely, dispensers for liquid soap, toilet paper dispensers; utensils for cosmetic purposes, namely, abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; eyebrow brushes; bath sponges; dispensers for cosmetic preparations, not adapted for medical use, namely, cotton ball dispensers; dispensers for bath gel or shampoo | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ZHONGSHAN LUENCHEONG DISPENSING PUMP LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CLC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |