Drawing for MEGADRIVE

USPTO serial 79091688

MEGADRIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4004660Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2011
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MEGADRIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Force and torque transmission systems for cranes, namely, mobile cranes and vehicle cranes, and their transportation systems sold as a unit; drive systems for cranes included in this class, namely, mobile and vehicle cranes; mechanical, hydraulic and hydrostatic crane drive systems and combinations of the same, namely, hydraulic pumps and motors for hydrostatic systems, comprised of pumps, motors, valves, switches, sensors, and electronic controls for hydraulic drives and force transmissions in mobile cranes and vehicle cranes; gear drives for mobile cranes and vehicle cranesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 1, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 10, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance