USPTO serial 79091706
L.F.C.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2013
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L.F.C.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
GB
Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
GB
Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
GB
Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
Brian R. McGinley DENTONS US LLPWACKER DRIVE STATION, WILLIS TOWERP.O. BOX #061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Monetary affairs, namely, banking services and banking consultation services, financial services in the field of money lending; lease-purchase financing services and mortgage lending services; real estate affairs, namely, real estate brokerage services, real estate consultation services, real estate investment services and real estate management services; credit and debit card services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by THE LIVERPOOL FOOTBALL CLUB AND ATHLETICGROUNDS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named L.F.C.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2020 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | FINA | FINAL DISPOSITION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |