USPTO serial 79091754
MYLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4686247Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2015
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MYLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700DENVER, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Photographic, cinematographic, optical instruments, namely, anti-reflective lenses and lens filters; ] eyeglasses; [ eyeglass lenses, ] spectacle frames; sunglasses; spectacle cases [ ; sports goggles ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | [ Precious metals and their alloys, namely, gold, silver; goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, jewelry boxes, figurines, jewel cases, trophies; jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MYKITA Studio GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MYKITA Studio GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mykita Studio GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mykita Studio GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named MYLON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 17, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |