Drawing for COLOUR WEAR

USPTO serial 79091972

COLOUR WEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOUR WEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Underwear, clothing, sweat-absorbent underclothing (underwear), ready-made clothing, ski clothing (other than for protection against injury)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 6, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2016CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 15, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance