Drawing for SYSTEC

USPTO serial 79092053

SYSTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4085776Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2012
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Modular management and information systems for shopping centers comprised of a microprocessor, electronic signal receiver, electronic signal transponder for attaching on shopping carts and related softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Transport vehicles, namely, shopping carts, motorized luggage carts, baby carriages; structural parts for motorized transport vehicles, namely, castors, handles, coin-operated power locks, children's safety belts, advertisement display boards specially adapted for use on transport vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 12, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 17, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 24, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 24, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 31, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2011GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2011RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance