USPTO serial 79092108
GOLFETTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLFETTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Silos of metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines for the food industry and agri-food industry, namely grain cleaning and scouring units, grain conveyors, grain treating machines, milling machines, hulling machines, flour mills, flour mill machines, animal feed drying machines, feed cutters or fodder cutting machines, feed mixers or fodder mixing machines, fodder presses, machines for the production of bio-ethanol from cereals, sorting machines for the processing of cereals, cereal husking machines, rice huskers, machines for grinding cereals, machines for filtering cereals, machines for mixing cereals, machines for peeling cereals, machines for finishing cereals, machines for rinsing cereals, machines for extracting cereals, centrifuges and centrifugal mills for cereals, rice and barley polishing machines, hammer mills, dampeners for cereals, purifiers for cereals, plansifters for processing cereals, sifters for cereals, degerminators for cereals, separators for cereals, detachers for cereals, roller mills, gravity selectors for cereals, mechanized livestock feeders, crushing machines for cereals, cereal dividing machines, vertical hoists for raising and storing food, fodder and cereals, handling apparatus for loading and unloading grain, machines for handling cereals and the like, namely palletizers, case elevators, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machines; mills being machines for grinding cereals and the like; milling apparatus for cereals and the like; parts and accessories of mills being machines for grinding cereals and the like and of milling apparatus, namely sieves, cutters, valves, pumps, filters, regulators, anti-friction bearing, centrifugal pumps, pneumatic controls, hydraulic controls, stators, brushes, tools, couplings, vacuum cleaners, conveyors, driving chains, compressors, belts, clutches, transmissions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |