USPTO serial 79092158
ECOLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
Staffordshire ST14 5JP, GB
J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
Staffordshire ST14 5JP, GB
J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
Staffordshire ST14 5JP, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DRIVEWILLIS TOWER, SUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated machines and apparatus for the digging, excavating, mechanical handling, lifting, loading and transporting of earth, minerals, soil, crops and the like, namely, agricultural machines, namely, telescopic handlers and wheeled loaders; earthmoving machines, namely, loaders, backhoes and excavators; power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, forklifts and telehandlers; front end loaders; skid-steer loaders; compacting and vibrating machines and equipment, namely, earth-compacting machines, including vibratory plate compactors; road rollers used with asphalt paving; asphalt and concrete cutting machines; structural parts for all these goods | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
- Other trademarks owned by J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
- Other trademarks owned by J.C.Bamford Excavators Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named ECOLIFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |