Drawing for HERBAL HARMONY

USPTO serial 79092174

HERBAL HARMONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4130209Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2012
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HERBAL HARMONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica S. Sachs

Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200TROY, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, including herbal spirits but not including beersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Retail store services featuring alcoholic beverages including herbal spiritsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Club activities, namely, fan clubsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2012UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 17, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2011UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance