USPTO serial 79092224
CAREMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAREMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rose Hickman Rigole
ROSE HICKMAN RIGOLE KARISH BJORGUM PC238 E UNION STUNIT APASADENA, CA 91101 1751Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management and operation of businesses providing personal and social care services in domestic homes; management and operation of businesses providing care staff to residential homes; business consultancy services relating to franchising for the provision of personal, and social care services in domestic homes; business consultancy services relating to franchising for the provision of care staff to residential homes | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Provision of cleaning services in domestic homes, namely, maid services in domestic homes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |