USPTO serial 79092516
MITA-TEKNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4208250Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MITA-TEKNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking, supervising, apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic vibration sensors for installation in wind mill housings, watt-hour meters, and computer hardware for wind mills and for automation industries, wind power plants, wind turbines and other wind-operated machines; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electronic controllers for automatically turning on or off the generator and for automatic starting after public power line break-downs; electronic sensors and controllers for over voltage protection against strokes of lightning; microprocessors for controlling and monitoring constant voltage, frequency, phase conditions, rotor speed, efficiency and thickness of brake pads, temperature, wind direction and wind speed; data processing equipment and computers, namely, computer hardware for wind mills and for automation industries, wind power plants, wind turbines and other wind-operated machines, and microprocessors for controlling and monitoring constant voltage, frequency, phase conditions, rotor speed, efficiency and thickness of brake pads, temperature, wind direction and wind speed; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | [ Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, industrial water purifying apparatus, wastewater purifying units for potable water for industrial use, and air purifying units for industrial use; steam generators and generating installations and structural parts therefor, solar power plants, wind and hydroelectric power plants, gas turbine power plants, condenser power plants, pump and air magazine power plants for the production and distribution of energy and for automation industries ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction, repair and installation services, namely, erection, construction, installation, maintenance and repair of wind mills, [ solar power plants, ] automation plants, and wind power plants; construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of wind turbine energy plants and other wind energy facilities; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mita-Teknik A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Mita-Teknik A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Mita-Teknik A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named MITA-TEKNIK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |