Drawing for CETRABEN

USPTO serial 79092529

CETRABEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4140698Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2012
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CETRABEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONNA J. BUNTON

DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C.11TH FLOOR901 NORTH GLEBE ROADARLINGTON, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SOAPS; SKIN EMOLLIENT CREAMS, HAIR EMOLLIENTS, SKIN EMOLLIENTS; NON-MEDICATED BARRIER CREAMS FOR THE SKIN; SKIN CONDITIONERS; CREAMS FOR SOOTHING THE SKIN, NAMELY, SKIN LOTION; NON-MEDICATED CREAMS FOR USE ON DRY SKIN; LOTIONS FOR THE CARE OF THE SKIN; NON-MEDICATED SKIN BALMS; NAPPY CREAM; NON-MEDICATED ACNE CLEANSERS, NON-MEDICATED ACNE CREAMS; BATH ADDITIVES, NAMELY, EMOLLIENT BATH ADDITIVES IN THE NATURE OF BATH SALTS, BATH BEADS, BATH OILS, BATH MILKS, BATH FOAMS, BATH LOTIONS, BATH CREAMS AND BATH GELSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 24, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 12, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 31, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2012ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2011NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance